Quote:
Originally Posted by schwarzwald
I understand your point. So, do you mean one shouldn't submit the same images to SS and say Mostphotos or Panthermedia since they sell images for 100 or 200 times the price as subscription sites? It's all getting a bit confusing. What do you suggest?
|
You can file this under personal opinion and the way I operate. I feel that as a seller of a product there needs to be some value and integrity.
If I have a photo up on any of the MicroStock sites, I will not put the same image up on Mostphoto, Alamy or someplace else that may charge $100 to $300 for the same picture.
I don't see a big deal about having something on SS for 25c for subscription, that's being sold for $5 on Panther, or $3 on Bigstock. They are all the same marketing. I listed all my "micro" photos on SV for $5 each.
If I have a picture that's special I will upload it to Alamy and nowhere else.
If it's kind of special and I don't want to sell it Micro or maybe it's not the right kind of image for that, (and won't get accepted anyways)

I may list it on MostPhoto or Featurepics.
Let me ask you and others to put themselves in the place of a buyer. You go to the store for a frozen pizza. You find a brand that looks pretty good and it's $15 for the deluxe combo with extra cheese. On the way home you stop for some soda and see the same pizza is selling for $3 at the gas station. Would you be angry at the first store?
You just bought a digital camera for $500 and a week later you see the same camera for $250. Don't you feel like you just got screwed?
Now think about someone who just bought your photo on a Mid-Stock site for $235 and they are looking around the web and see that it's for sale on CheapStock for three dollars! Talk about angry! Paying 78 times more for a photo, or paying $232 more for the same photo, no matter how you look at it, someone is going to be mighty pissed off.
That's why.
What I haven't seen is how someone can justify selling a picture for 25 cents in one place and then asking over $200 for the same photo. How does someone explain the ethics behind that?
OK that's the way I feel about it from my own personal view. Maybe someone else feels differently. I just don't understand how.