Talkmicro

Go Back   Talkmicro > Talk-Micro > Micro Darkroom

Micro Darkroom Photography, videography, post-production and more...the art of creating images explored

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2007, 04:35 PM
Karimala's Avatar
Boomer Sooner!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,419
Default What makes a good editorial photo?

It took a couple of tries, but these images from California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's inauguration were finally accepted at SS. They were originally rejected on technicalities...focal point, purple fringing, and limited commercial value respectively.


So what makes a good editorial image? It's not technical perfection, that's for sure! These images are far from perfect. All were shot at 1600 ISO without a flash and with a less than ideal aperature setting (4.5 on the color guard, and 5.6 on the other two). They had a ton of noise and are somewhat soft. Nevertheless, these are all sound editorial images.

It's the historical and newsworthy significance that makes a good editorial image. When I asked for a re-evaluation based on those merits instead of technical merits (and admitting to recongizing the flaws), they were all accepted. A news photo editor interested in a shot of a political gathering or inauguration or the governor and his wife isn't going to care if there is a slight imperfection. They are interested in the event and the people above all. They also recognize that this is a once-in-a-lifetime event that cannot be reshot in order to acheive technical perfection.

What do you think makes a good editorial image?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2007, 11:05 AM
AB8ND's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 70
Default

Hi all - newbie here.

I agree that content is much more important than technical perfection in an editoral photo, that is probably why PJ's used to say "f/8 and be there on time, just get the shot". That said, it is amazing how technically good their shots are though.

Jack
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2007, 04:17 PM
thesupe87's Avatar
AIM: graficallyminded
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,916
Send a message via AIM to thesupe87 Send a message via Yahoo to thesupe87
Default

That's shocking to me. How RARE is an Arnold Schwartzenager photo on a micropayment website!? EXTREMELY. How dumb are these people? Have they seen how these images look in publications in the grocery store? CRAPPY. I think they should sacrifice their quality standards a little bit for the RARE, once in a lifetime images...it's not like you can call him up and ask him to re-shoot it.
__________________
s e l l p h o t o s . t k

Top SellersShutterstockFotoliaDreamstimeBigStockStockXpertFeaturePicsMostPhotos
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2007, 05:01 PM
Karimala's Avatar
Boomer Sooner!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,419
Default

Yeh...I had a little face-to-face chat with setho from SS yesterday about odd rejections and firming up their policies when we were at the Macworld Expo. Think I scared him a little, poor guy...LOL
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-14-2007, 04:19 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 62
Default

You could try these at Citizen Image. They have a news/publishing bent with lots of candids and events. They even post requests for specific event coverage or publisher requirements.

Good luck.
__________________
BigWhiteBox | FeaturePics | Citizen Image |
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:10 PM.

Kirsch designed by Andrew & Austin


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0