Intresting stuff.

I was most surprised to see in the charts that overall stock (non-micro) photographers experienced only a 2% drop in income from 2005-2006. With all the "sky is falling" doomsday talk from the old-schoolers, I would have expected a more significant drop. Sure it's still a drop, and not an increase, which sucks no matter how you look at it. It's just not the massive decline that many people make it out to be.

Also interesting was the chart that showed average incomes of traditional stock compared to microstock, and traditional was kicking the crap out of micro incomes.